Pathos #1 (ch 1-14) The reader is introduced to the Shelby's in the beginning of the novel, a couple who are kind to the slaves that they own, much unlike others of the time. On page 46, Mr Shelby claims that he is a "humane man" and would never "take a son from his mother". In this scene, Shelby attempts to evoke emotion in Haley, especially through his mention of family. In addition, Stowe talks to the audience by using second person, and on page 105, she states "If it were your Harry, how fast could you walk?" This type of narration conjures feelings in the reader, especially in mothers who care so much for their own child. As a result, the owner of the shop Eliza visits had her "motherly sympathies aroused" (108). When Eliza meets the Bird's for the first time, she tells them of her story about Harry, and Mrs Birdie completely falls down in tears at the thought. This is another example of Pathos because a character represents all the mother's who have lost children, and may change their stance on the debate of slavery, because of the heroic and tear jerking actions of Eliza (149).
Using pathos Stowe engages the reader to portray the evils of slavery. When Mr. Shelby is hesitant about the idea of selling Mr. Haley tries to convince Mr. Shelby of selling him. He says that he should take Harry away when Eliza is away and then give her gifts like jewelry as reimbursement. It is unethical to separate a child from his mother and by targeting mothers, she evokes "motherly sympathies" that no child should be separated from their mother for slavery and no materialistic object could ever replace a woman’s child. Stowe's use of Pathos is an argument against slavery because it shows how terrible this institution was to families and individuals.
Throughout the entire novel, Harriet Beecher Stowe works to convince her readers that slavery should be abolished. She lives through characters to argue against individuals such as Mr. Haley, “my friend, how dare you, how could you carry on a trade like this” (202), calling others who can relate to him, to consider the purpose behind their actions. She acknowledges Haley’s counterarguments, one being that “they ain’t a bit more trouble than pups” (206), however, Stowe works through pathos to evoke pity. She also calls slaveholders to understand that blacks were “used to a great many things” (212) they could not imagine. She calls her readers to be humane and treat their slaves as they would want to be treated, or to end slavery altogether.
Reply #4 The purpose of Uncle Tom's Cabin is to argue for the abolition of slavery. Another reason why Stowe mostly likely aroused "motherly sympathies" is because loosing children to sickness and child birth was very common. To have a child be born healthy only to be stolen to be sold into slavery evoked sympathy from mothers and would encourage them to fight for the abolition of slavery so that no mother would have to experience their child being ripped away from them for selfish reasons.
Pathos #2 Eva was any parent’s ideal child: loving, caring, and everything in between. She always wanted the best for those around her and never hesitated to stop and help anyone, whether they be a family member or one of her slaves. Her family constantly described her as “impulsively generous” and always “absorbed in works of love and kindness” (385), traits that are difficult to find in children Eva’s age. These characteristics may intrigue the reader, and ask themselves if they have been kind to others recently. When a young girl acts extraordinary, elders feel a pit in their stomachs because they should be acting greater than her! This makes Stowe’s writing all the more impressive because it makes the the readers act upon her work and possibly do good in the world, just like little Eva did.
Good connections Kat! Eva seems like such a sweet child, especially when she took mercy on Uncle Tom and treated him like a normal human being, which is quite unlike how many slaves of the time were treated. I think that by using Eva as an example of a kind, gentle, and sweet little girl, Stowe attempted to have the audience feel and emotional connection between the two characters; if a simple child is able to treat a black with kindness, then why shouldn't any other person? In such, Stowe evokes a sense of guilt in slave owners or pro slavery people of the century, because of the fact that a child can overlook a man's skin color, and adults cannot.
Pathos #3: In chapter 29, Marie orders Rosa, a slave, to be sent to a whipping house to be "subjected to brutal exposure and shameful correction" for trying on Marie's dress (260). Marie cannot comprehend, even after scolding from Miss Ophelia, why it is cruel to send Rosa to a whipping house. Marie says she would like to "know what the cruelty is...she wrote orders for only fifteen lashes, and told him to put them on lightly. [She's] sure there is no cruelty there!" (461). Her use of the word "only" shows that she truly does not think this is a bad punishment, especially because they will be "light." This passage evokes pathos in the reader, who likely will be angry and realize that Marie has never even felt a whip in her life and never will. The reader also may be saddened that she feels no remorse for subjecting a human being to that kind of pain and suffering only for putting on a dress. Lastly, the reader will feel fear and be scared for Rosa, who will have to endure a huge amount of pain at the whipping house.
Reply #10 Ouch! Both the diction and pathos in your quote make me feel sympathy for the slaves! They do not deserve this. I feel very saddened, and I wasn’t even affected by the pain. All of these feeling encompass what a reader may feel after reading this, and I think these exemplify the strength behind Stowe’s writing. She is able to evoke different emotions and feelings within the reader, showing her literature influence in the novel.
This reminds me of when Henrique hit Dodo for allowing his horse to get dusty. Most of the time, when children do something wrong, we get upset with them but blame their "learned behavior" on somebody else. When children like Henrique are not corrected, they are destined to turn into Marie's. Stowe is trying to tell us that the new generation is the next hope. The next generation must be brought up correctly, learning from the past generations mistakes. If they are not taught the right way, life will not improve.
Reply #8 Marie makes me angry. The way she views and treats slaves just frustrates me to no end. Maureen you pointed out that by using of the word "only" it shows that she truly does not think being whipped is a bad punishment, especially because they will be "light." And I totally agree that this one sentence evokes anger because it did for me. Seriously she thought whipping wasn't a bad punishment - slaves died from being whipped. She thinks that the lashing will be "light" but when you send a slave to the whipping house there is not such thing as a "light" lashing. I'm just so horrified with Marie''s thought process. Another reason why Marie makes me so frustrated is knowing Uncle Tom's Cabin wasn't a fantasy or fiction book based on mythology but based on slavery, which was a horrible situation for African Americans and something part of African Americans history that hasn't been entirely forgiven.
Pathos #5 Throughout Uncle Tom’s Cabin Stowe arouses “motherly sympathies” (108) to argue for the abolition of slavery. Slavery separated families; mothers, husbands, children, and siblings. No slave was safe from the greedy slave trade and could be sold at any moment. Eliza and George were both separated from their families at young ages believing they’d never meet again. Georges sister was “sold to the South when he was a boy” (600)and Eliza was sold to “a man of the name of Simmons” (601) who the Shelby family bought Eliza from. However, later in the novel we discover Cassy is Eliza’s mother and Madame de Thoux, George’s sister, is searching for him. Through Mr. Shelby both discover the whereabouts of their family members - Canada. It was only through freedom that these families were reunited. Stowe argues that through abolition separated families can be reunited.
Comment #7 As I was reading and annotating, all I could find were examples of pathos! Stowe tries to appeal not only to mothers, but also any human who has feelings. With her strong use of diction to describe the horror that was slavery, any reader who has a heart, would feel pangs of sadness and guilt. The seperation of families is such an important topic in the novel. Going off of what you said Natalie, remember when Harry was going to be separated from Eliza and Eliza cared for her son too much and risked her life to save her son? This heroic act and description of how a mother cares for her son is so amazing and would appeal to anyone with a soul. In such, Stowe is able to appeal to almost any type of reader with the use of Pathos.
Comment #6 I agree with you harper! Stowe's use of pathos evokes the feelings of mothers and and any "human who has feelings". I do agree with Natalie though, because I think the appeal to mother's is a central theme since the beginning of the novel. In chapter 7, the narrator says "If it were your Harry, mother, or your Willie, that were going to be torn from you by a brutal trader...how fast could you walk?" (105) This rhetorical question can hold a strong power to a reader. I think these "motherly sympathies" also play a role in Stowe's purpose to display the moral power of women. Maybe Stowe was trying to point the finger at women abolitionists.
When I get an amber alert on my phone, my heart sinks a little. Missing children not only break the hearts of local civilians, but the parents who have to live through the pain of living without their child. In chapter 18, Prue comes to visit Dinah at St. Clare's. Once again, Prue is hungover. She tells Dinah, "O Lord! I wish't I's dead!" (319) Prue's master has sold all of her children in to slavery, and this is a burden that she can simply not live with. She drinks to take away the pain, but drinking brings even more pain to her because it brings more trouble to her. Prue's story evokes emotion in the audience, because the feeling of love for a family member is not an uncommon sentiment. This scene is even more heartbreaking because Prue is just one small character to a larger story. Stowe is displaying that their was a larger community of slaves with just as horrific of stories as the one she is telling.
Pathos #1 (ch 1-14)
ReplyDeleteThe reader is introduced to the Shelby's in the beginning of the novel, a couple who are kind to the slaves that they own, much unlike others of the time. On page 46, Mr Shelby claims that he is a "humane man" and would never "take a son from his mother". In this scene, Shelby attempts to evoke emotion in Haley, especially through his mention of family. In addition, Stowe talks to the audience by using second person, and on page 105, she states "If it were your Harry, how fast could you walk?" This type of narration conjures feelings in the reader, especially in mothers who care so much for their own child. As a result, the owner of the shop Eliza visits had her "motherly sympathies aroused" (108).
When Eliza meets the Bird's for the first time, she tells them of her story about Harry, and Mrs Birdie completely falls down in tears at the thought. This is another example of Pathos because a character represents all the mother's who have lost children, and may change their stance on the debate of slavery, because of the heroic and tear jerking actions of Eliza (149).
Using pathos Stowe engages the reader to portray the evils of slavery. When Mr. Shelby is hesitant about the idea of selling Mr. Haley tries to convince Mr. Shelby of selling him. He says that he should take Harry away when Eliza is away and then give her gifts like jewelry as reimbursement. It is unethical to separate a child from his mother and by targeting mothers, she evokes "motherly sympathies" that no child should be separated from their mother for slavery and no materialistic object could ever replace a woman’s child. Stowe's use of Pathos is an argument against slavery because it shows how terrible this institution was to families and individuals.
DeleteThroughout the entire novel, Harriet Beecher Stowe works to convince her readers that slavery should be abolished. She lives through characters to argue against individuals such as Mr. Haley, “my friend, how dare you, how could you carry on a trade like this” (202), calling others who can relate to him, to consider the purpose behind their actions. She acknowledges Haley’s counterarguments, one being that “they ain’t a bit more trouble than pups” (206), however, Stowe works through pathos to evoke pity. She also calls slaveholders to understand that blacks were “used to a great many things” (212) they could not imagine. She calls her readers to be humane and treat their slaves as they would want to be treated, or to end slavery altogether.
DeleteReply #4
DeleteThe purpose of Uncle Tom's Cabin is to argue for the abolition of slavery. Another reason why Stowe mostly likely aroused "motherly sympathies" is because loosing children to sickness and child birth was very common. To have a child be born healthy only to be stolen to be sold into slavery evoked sympathy from mothers and would encourage them to fight for the abolition of slavery so that no mother would have to experience their child being ripped away from them for selfish reasons.
Pathos #2
ReplyDeleteEva was any parent’s ideal child: loving, caring, and everything in between. She always wanted the best for those around her and never hesitated to stop and help anyone, whether they be a family member or one of her slaves. Her family constantly described her as “impulsively generous” and always “absorbed in works of love and kindness” (385), traits that are difficult to find in children Eva’s age. These characteristics may intrigue the reader, and ask themselves if they have been kind to others recently. When a young girl acts extraordinary, elders feel a pit in their stomachs because they should be acting greater than her! This makes Stowe’s writing all the more impressive because it makes the the readers act upon her work and possibly do good in the world, just like little Eva did.
Good connections Kat! Eva seems like such a sweet child, especially when she took mercy on Uncle Tom and treated him like a normal human being, which is quite unlike how many slaves of the time were treated. I think that by using Eva as an example of a kind, gentle, and sweet little girl, Stowe attempted to have the audience feel and emotional connection between the two characters; if a simple child is able to treat a black with kindness, then why shouldn't any other person? In such, Stowe evokes a sense of guilt in slave owners or pro slavery people of the century, because of the fact that a child can overlook a man's skin color, and adults cannot.
DeletePathos #3:
ReplyDeleteIn chapter 29, Marie orders Rosa, a slave, to be sent to a whipping house to be "subjected to brutal exposure and shameful correction" for trying on Marie's dress (260). Marie cannot comprehend, even after scolding from Miss Ophelia, why it is cruel to send Rosa to a whipping house. Marie says she would like to "know what the cruelty is...she wrote orders for only fifteen lashes, and told him to put them on lightly. [She's] sure there is no cruelty there!" (461). Her use of the word "only" shows that she truly does not think this is a bad punishment, especially because they will be "light." This passage evokes pathos in the reader, who likely will be angry and realize that Marie has never even felt a whip in her life and never will. The reader also may be saddened that she feels no remorse for subjecting a human being to that kind of pain and suffering only for putting on a dress. Lastly, the reader will feel fear and be scared for Rosa, who will have to endure a huge amount of pain at the whipping house.
Reply #10
DeleteOuch! Both the diction and pathos in your quote make me feel sympathy for the slaves! They do not deserve this. I feel very saddened, and I wasn’t even affected by the pain. All of these feeling encompass what a reader may feel after reading this, and I think these exemplify the strength behind Stowe’s writing. She is able to evoke different emotions and feelings within the reader, showing her literature influence in the novel.
This reminds me of when Henrique hit Dodo for allowing his horse to get dusty. Most of the time, when children do something wrong, we get upset with them but blame their "learned behavior" on somebody else. When children like Henrique are not corrected, they are destined to turn into Marie's. Stowe is trying to tell us that the new generation is the next hope. The next generation must be brought up correctly, learning from the past generations mistakes. If they are not taught the right way, life will not improve.
DeleteReply #8
DeleteMarie makes me angry. The way she views and treats slaves just frustrates me to no end. Maureen you pointed out that by using of the word "only" it shows that she truly does not think being whipped is a bad punishment, especially because they will be "light." And I totally agree that this one sentence evokes anger because it did for me. Seriously she thought whipping wasn't a bad punishment - slaves died from being whipped. She thinks that the lashing will be "light" but when you send a slave to the whipping house there is not such thing as a "light" lashing. I'm just so horrified with Marie''s thought process. Another reason why Marie makes me so frustrated is knowing Uncle Tom's Cabin wasn't a fantasy or fiction book based on mythology but based on slavery, which was a horrible situation for African Americans and something part of African Americans history that hasn't been entirely forgiven.
Pathos #5
ReplyDeleteThroughout Uncle Tom’s Cabin Stowe arouses “motherly sympathies” (108) to argue for the abolition of slavery. Slavery separated families; mothers, husbands, children, and siblings. No slave was safe from the greedy slave trade and could be sold at any moment. Eliza and George were both separated from their families at young ages believing they’d never meet again. Georges sister was “sold to the South when he was a boy” (600)and Eliza was sold to “a man of the name of Simmons” (601) who the Shelby family bought Eliza from. However, later in the novel we discover Cassy is Eliza’s mother and Madame de Thoux, George’s sister, is searching for him. Through Mr. Shelby both discover the whereabouts of their family members - Canada. It was only through freedom that these families were reunited. Stowe argues that through abolition separated families can be reunited.
Comment #7
DeleteAs I was reading and annotating, all I could find were examples of pathos! Stowe tries to appeal not only to mothers, but also any human who has feelings. With her strong use of diction to describe the horror that was slavery, any reader who has a heart, would feel pangs of sadness and guilt. The seperation of families is such an important topic in the novel. Going off of what you said Natalie, remember when Harry was going to be separated from Eliza and Eliza cared for her son too much and risked her life to save her son? This heroic act and description of how a mother cares for her son is so amazing and would appeal to anyone with a soul. In such, Stowe is able to appeal to almost any type of reader with the use of Pathos.
Comment #6
DeleteI agree with you harper! Stowe's use of pathos evokes the feelings of mothers and and any "human who has feelings". I do agree with Natalie though, because I think the appeal to mother's is a central theme since the beginning of the novel. In chapter 7, the narrator says "If it were your Harry, mother, or your Willie, that were going to be torn from you by a brutal trader...how fast could you walk?" (105) This rhetorical question can hold a strong power to a reader. I think these "motherly sympathies" also play a role in Stowe's purpose to display the moral power of women. Maybe Stowe was trying to point the finger at women abolitionists.
Pathos #4
ReplyDeleteWhen I get an amber alert on my phone, my heart sinks a little. Missing children not only break the hearts of local civilians, but the parents who have to live through the pain of living without their child. In chapter 18, Prue comes to visit Dinah at St. Clare's. Once again, Prue is hungover. She tells Dinah, "O Lord! I wish't I's dead!" (319) Prue's master has sold all of her children in to slavery, and this is a burden that she can simply not live with. She drinks to take away the pain, but drinking brings even more pain to her because it brings more trouble to her. Prue's story evokes emotion in the audience, because the feeling of love for a family member is not an uncommon sentiment. This scene is even more heartbreaking because Prue is just one small character to a larger story. Stowe is displaying that their was a larger community of slaves with just as horrific of stories as the one she is telling.